The first scholar to test Augustine's
claim that Mark composed a condensed edition (epitome) of Matthew. In 1782 Koppe was a professor at Göttingen (Germany), when he published a thesis
entitled "Mark was not an
abbreviator of Matthew"
(Marcus non epitamator Matthei). His argument focused on four
observations:
-
Mark often differs from Matthew in order and
details. The pattern of variations is not typical of someone
summarizing another's work, since Mark's passages are often longer
than Matthew's.
-
Where Mark deviates from Matthew he
regularly agrees with Luke, not only in order but also in content.
-
If Luke knew the works of both
Matthew & Mark, as Augustine had claimed, then he regularly adopted
Mark's readings rather than Matthew's.
-
Luke's preference for Markan wording &
sequence shows that he valued Mark as a source independent of &
superior to Matthew.
Koppe concluded that Mark &
Luke had sources other than Matthew since
- Mark often deviated from Matthew's wording
&
- Luke regularly preferred Mark's version.
To explain the patterns of
similarity & differences in the synoptic gospels, Koppe argued that the
canonical gospels must have been based upon earlier Hebrew & Greek
documents that are no longer in existence. Koppe did not attempt to describe
these documents in any detail. But he was the first to propose
the hypothesis
that the canonical gospels are based on a non-canonical Greek source.
Koppe's emphasis on the parallels between Mark & Luke, led J.
J. Griesbach to propose
the hypothesis that Mark is a condensed version of both Matthew & Luke.
[For a brief summary of Koppe's
argument see W.R. Farmer, The Synoptic Problem: A Critical Analysis
(NY: Macmillan, 1964), pp. 6-7].
Other On-line Resources: