One of the most creative minds
of the German Enlightenment. The son of a prominent theologian, Lessing was
trained in the classics & theology, and eventually earned a degree in
medicine. But from his student days, his real love was literature &
theater. His comedies & tragedies, dealing with current situations, were
the first works of German drama of lasting significance & influence. His
life was marked by repeated financial crises that forced moves between
Leipzig, Wittenberg & Berlin. In 1770 he accepted the duke of Brunswick's
offer of a poorly paid position as librarian at Wolfenbüttel, where he
produced his most important works, including
Nathan the Wise (1779), a
dramatic dialog arguing the philosophical case for religious tolerance.
Even more significant, however,
was Lessing's decision to publish portions of a manuscript on rational
religion that the daughter of H. S. Reimarus had given to him
after her father's death (1767). These
"Wolfenbüttel Fragments" (released anonymously from 1774-78) included
essays on resurrection & "the aims of Jesus and his disciples." The
latter was the first work to draw attention to the difference between the
historical situation of a 1st c. Jew named Jesus of Nazareth & Christian
dogma about Christ as the heavenly son of God. This distinction launched the
most prolonged debate in modern NT
scholarship: the quest of the historical
Jesus.
Lessing himself did not
publicly endorse Reimarus' views. But, more than a decade before Jefferson
drafted the American bill of rights, this German humanist defended the right
to conduct an open public discussion of the theological & historical
issues these fragments raised. Since Lessing would not reveal the identity of
the author of the fragments he had published, he himself became the target of
criticism by conservative theologians. The controversy cost Lessing his
position & his health. He died a pauper & was buried in a public
grave.
Like Reimarus', Lessing's own
research on the gospels was published posthumously (1784). To defend his
decision to publish Reimarus' historical research into Christian origins,
Lessing composed "A New Hypothesis
on the Evangelists as merely Human Historians" (1778) in
which he proposed a purely literary solution to the problem of the
relationship between the canonical gospels. Lessing's theory was not totally
new, but was rather a synthesis of traditional hypotheses (from early
Christian authors like Papias)
with observable facts:
- the original gospel (ascribed to Matthew)
was composed in Hebrew [hypothesis];
- the primal gospel was used by other
evangelists [hypothesis];
- the canonical gospel of Matthew was composed
in Greek [fact];
- there were groups of early Jewish Christians
who used a gospel (ascribed to Matthew) that differed in contents from
canonical Matthew [fact].
On the basis of this
information Lessing theorized that the apostle Matthew had dictated (not
written) a Semitic gospel that remained in circulation among Jewish Christians
for 30 years. When Christianity spread to non-Jews, this Semitic document was
used as a common source for different Greek versions of the gospel.
The authors of Matthew, Mark & Luke did not translate the whole original
source, but merely selected some portions. Lessing thought Luke
reproduced almost all of this hypothetical
source.
While Lessing's hypothesis of a
comprehensive primal gospel was not sustained by further research, it focused
research on several key points:
- the chronological &
cultural gap between Jesus & the composition of the gospels;
- the idea that existing
gospels are edited versions of a source now lost;
- the idea that similarity
between two works indicates an indirect literary relationship: A &
B copy C without consulting each other.
The last two points are
especially important for the development of the 2 source hypothesis.
[For select quotes see W. G.
Kümmel, The NT: The History of the Investigation of its Problems
(NY/Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1972), pp. 76-77].
Other On-line Resources: