Eminent German
  rationalist theologian & father of modern literary/historical
  analysis of the biblical text. Born in Hesse, Griesbach studied under Johann S. Semler at
  Halle (Prussia). He expanded the ms. base of the Greek
  NT with mss.
  he discovered during extensive travels & published (1774-75) the first revised edition of the
  traditional Greek "received
  text," complete with an extensive critical
  apparatus. He was appointed professor of NT studies at the U of Jena (1775).
  In 1776 he published A Synopsis
  of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark & Luke, the work that launched modern
  gospel studies. Since that time these three gospels have been referred to as
  "the synoptics."
  Pointing to
  discrepancies between gospel narratives, Griesbach dismissed traditional
  attempts to harmonize
  these accounts & focused attention on their literary dependence instead.
  He accepted J. B. Koppe's observation
  that the text of Mark is often closer to 
	Luke. This led him to turn 
  Augustine's theory that Luke used 
	Matthew
  & Mark around and claim that Mark was an uninspired compilation from
  Matthew & Luke. In 1789 he published his defense of this thesis as
  "A Demonstration that the Whole Gospel of Mark is Excerpted from the
  Narratives of Matthew & Luke" (Commentatio Qua Marci Evangelium 
	totum e Matthaei et Lucae commentariis decerptum esse monstratur). In
  the 19th c. Griesbach's thesis was championed by his student, W.
  L. de Wette. After years of
  neglect it was revived in 1964 by the American scholar, W. R.
  Farmer as "the Two Gospel
  hypothesis."
  In his
  Demonstration, Griesbach summed up his argument as follows:
  
  This is a summary of the thesis we
  are defending:
  
  
    - 
      
When writing his book, Mark
      had not only Matthew but also Luke positioned before his eyes;
     
    - 
      
and from these (texts) he
      excerpted whatever deeds, speeches and sayings of the Savior he committed
      to memory;
     
    - 
      
so that mainly & most
      often he followed Matthew as a guide;
      yet sometimes, leaving Matthew, he allied himself with Luke;
     
    - 
      
where he would stick to
      Matthew's tracks, he still would not let Luke out of his eyesight, but
      would compare him with Matthew and vice-versa;
     
    - 
      
he would try to be brief, as
      he wanted to write a book with minimum mass; So not only did he leave out
      what was not pertinent to the role of teacher, which the Lord performed in
      public..., he also passed over several of Christ's wordier speeches.
     
    - 
      
Furthermore, ...he kept in
      mind his readers: that is, people far from Palestine, among whom the
      maxims & customs of Palestinian Jews, especially the Pharisees, were
      not well known, nor were necessary to know; so, partly for this reason,
      
        - 
          
he would cut out some
          things found in Matthew or Luke that were meant only for Jews,
          especially those in Palestine, or fit their way of thinking...,
         
        - 
          
he would be stingier in
          citing OT passages...,
         
        - 
          
he would add things that
          he thought necessary as illustration or useful for his readers to
          understand the narrative....
         
      
     
  
  Thus, in
  Griesbach's view, Mark worked like a cross between a researcher & a
  Reader's Digest editor to produce for non-Jewish readers a single condensed
  version of two books, adding only minor details & 24 new sentences to
  passages quoted from his sources. Other scholars, like J. G. 
  Herder, were not persuaded that this presented a realistic picture of how ancient
  scribes functioned.
  [For full text
  & further information see J. J. Griesbach: Synoptic and text- critical
  studies 1776-1976 (ed. by B. Orchard & T. R. W. Longstaff) Cambridge:
  Cambridge U. Press, 1978. The passage translated here from Latin is found on
  pp. 76-77].
  [For a detailed
  analysis & appraisal of Griesbach's hypothesis, see C. M. Tuckett, The
  Revival of the Griesbach Hypothesis, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press, 1983].
  Other On-line Resources