| 
   
  
Note: Some texts are buried
deep in e-archives. If title link does not work, click source. 
  
  
  
 Gospels
  
General 
Synoptics 
  
  
    
      
  M. H. Smith compares the Q hypothesis with
  other proposed solutions to the synoptic problem (especially Griesbach-Farmer
  and Farrer-Goulder) and concludes that Q belongs in a scholar's canon of early
  Christian sources. 
 
  Mark Goodacre provides a lucid summary of
	reasons
  to question Q, extensive information on the alternative to the Q hypothesis first proposed 
  by A. M. Farrer, & fresh research on
  the synoptic problem, like Goodacre's recent articles on
	"Fatigue
  in the Synoptics" & 
	"Fallacies
  at the Heart of Q." 
 
  Paper by William R. Farmer, leading champion of
  the Griesbach source theory, presented to the international Society for New
  Testament Studies (August 1998). 
 
  Outline of primary evangelical explanations of
  differences in Matthew, Mark & Luke. Posted by Xenos for evangelists. 
 
  Analysis of the historical source of non-Markan 
	material common to Matthew and Luke [posted on 
	Jesus Seminar Forum].   
 
  Jerome H. Neyrey analyzes the controversy
  stories in Mark (U of Notre Dame). 
 
  English translation of the
  reconstructed text of the synoptic sayings source published by the
  International Q Project in 2001 (posted by John Kloppenborg). 
 
  1961 lecture by Joachim Jeremias'  
  summarizes his
  form & redaction critical analysis of Matt 5-7 [posted by
	Biblical Studies (UK)]. 
 
  Dave Gentile's statistical analysis of the
  vocabulary of Matthew, Mark & Luke supports Markan priority & tends to
  favor Luke's use of Matthew as well as Q. 
 
  M. H. Smith's
  e-sourcebook provides 
	gospel
  outlines, a hyper-glossary & a
  sample
  synopsis to illustrate the textual basis & history of scholarly
  hypotheses related to the Synoptic Problem. Color-coded
	Greek 
	synopsis for advanced users. 
 
  Site developed by Stephen C. Carlson as
  clearinghouse to resolve the literary relationship between Matthew, Mark &
  Luke. Sketches  major hypotheses & proponents. Basic tools for analysis
  (table of
  parallels,  history of scholarship &
  
	annotated
  bibliography).
   
 
   Complete text of Geoffrey Buswell's 1961
  translation of Hans Conzelmann's pioneering study in redaction criticism (Internet 
	Archive). 
 
  Summary of J. J. Griesbach's theory of the
  relationship of the synoptic gospels (Wikipedia). 
 
      | 
     
   
  
 
Fourth Gospel 
  
  
    
      
  W. Hall Harris provides an introduction to
  Johannine scholarship & a chapter by chapter commentary on the Fourth
  Gospel [posted by Bible.org]. 
 
  Complete text of C. H. Dodd's 1953 
	classic study (Internet Archive).  
 
  Comprehensive list of electronic materials for
  the study of the 4th Gospel & the letters of John including scholarly
  e-articles & book reviews (maintained by Felix Just). 
 
  Bruce J. Malina cites the use of intimate
  language in the 4th Gospel as evidence of the author's accommodation of his
  message to his audience  [Biblical Theology Bulletin 24 (1994):167-82
  posted on Early Christian
  Writings]. 
 
  Ramon K. Jusino marshals literary evidence that
  Mary was the author of the original core of the Johannine narrative. 
 
  Andrew Bernhard presents Robert T. Fortna's
  reconstruction of an early narrative source edited by the author of the gospel
  of John (archived by Early 
	Christian Writings). 
 
  Terry A. Larm surveys & assesses recent
  scholars' interpretations of the function of Johannine sources &
  composition [Theological
  Gathering 1 (Fall 1996) posted on Early
  Christian Writings]. 
 
  James F. McGrath presents a useful
  overview of major 20th c. scholarship on the gospel of John [Theological
  Gathering 4 (Fall 1997) posted on Early
  Christian Writings]. 
 
     | 
    
  
 
 
Non-canonical Gospels 
  
  
    
      
  Jack Kilmon reconstructs the lost Greek text of a
  letter by Clement of Alexandria citing passages from an esoteric version of
  the gospel of Mark. 
 
  Analysis & translation of 2nd c. gnostic 
	dialogue that presents Mary as revealer of the risen Savior (posted by the
	Nazarene Way).  
	 
 
  Hyperlinked catalogue of cyber & 
	print resources includes
	digital images of 
	the 3rd c. Coptic ms. found at Nag Hammadi and English translations by
	Stevan Davies,
	Marvin Meyer, &
	Stephen Patterson 
	with the 2nd c. Greek 
	fragments and other on-line tools (archived by
	Gnostic Society Library). 
 
  Scholars debate the historical
  importance of the 2nd c. Gospel of Judas which portrays Judas Iscariot as
  Jesus' chosen collaborator in leaving the physical world (NY Times April 7,
  2006). 
 
  English  translation of the 
	gospels of Thomas, Philip & Truth with anti-Pauline 
	commentary
  by Paterson Brown. 
 
  Wieland Willker presents
	photos,
  transcriptions
  & 
	translations
  of this early unknown eclectic gospel with passages 
	parallel
  to both John & the synoptics. 
 
  Shawn Eyer's 1995 review (from the journal Alexandria) provides detailed background for the scholarly controversy
  generated by Morton Smith's discovery of references to a secret edition of
  Mark in a ms. of a letter of Clement of Alexandria. 
 
       | 
     
   
  
 
 
 Jesus & Christology 
  
 
  
Digging. Help fill holes. 
This page was revised 
30 January 2023 
 |